yllektmass

Are WE ALL Equal Under The Law

In Being A Responsible Person, Legislation, Sam's Simple Facts, The Voice of America on March 1, 2013 at 3:00 am

IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED

Dear fellow Equal Free Individual Thinker, Patriot, and Law Abiding Citizens. I very rarely get in the mode I am right now, but it is imperative that WE ALL make a CHOICE right NOW.

“The loss of one freedom always, without fail, leads to the loss of all freedoms” – Sam

No matter what your political party, religious or non-religious belief, your race, sex, color, personal opinions, preferences, age, etc. We are ALL equal under the law. Or I should say, we are all SUPPOSE to be equal under the law.

Here in The United States of America, we have a form of government unlike any seen before. We are a nation, as declared in our Constitution, that grants each and every one of us the responsibility to actively participate in the governance of OUR nation. But, are we slowly fading away from that principle of freedom?

I must mention this here; though this article was motivated by the gun legislation being proposed by Sen. Feinstein, this article is about much more than that. It’s about the future of all the rights guaranteed by OUR U.S. Constitution. Please read through the entire article before you form an opinion. I promise you there is information here that affects every citizen, whether you are a gun owner or not.

Diane Feinstein has competed a proposed bill. It is her “NEW and Updated Assault Weapons Ban”which she plans on introducing at the earliest, Days from RIGHT NOW, at the very latest a few weeks from RIGHT NOW.

At this time in OUR Nations History, WE ALL Must address the following question;

Are OUR representatives overstepping the legal limits their position is bound by?

According to Article 5 U.S.C. 7311,  the law each and every representative takes an OATH to abide by, and promise to enforce, EVERY single one of OUR representatives are bound BY LAW in order to be VALID for their citizen elected opportunity to represent EACH and EVERY one of us EQUALLY under the United States Constitution’s BINDING limits.

Article 5 U.S.C. 7311 states [1]:

An individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he (or She)-

  1. advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
  2. is a member of an organization that he/she knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
  3. participates in a strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; or
  4. is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he/she knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia.

Simple Fact: The United States of America is a nations of laws. EVERY citizen, whether an individual private citizen or a citizen who has been elected by We The People to Represent any district or the entire populace of citizens, are ALL EQUALLY bound by the limits of the exact same laws.

Simple Fact: The United States Constitution is the Supreme Law of The Land, meaning the ENTIRE United States, as well as Each and Every citizen residing within the boundaries of The United States are ALL EQUALLY subject to the laws in compliance with The Supreme Law of The Land.

To understand what Article5 U.S.C. 7311 REALLY states, and to remain COMPLETELY Honest,Truthful and Factual, we must define the words Strike, and Advocates.

What follows is detailed, but is VERY IMPORTANT:

According to the Merriam-Webster On-Line Dictionary, the following definitions apply [2][3]

STRIKE: (verb) –

1: to take a course
2b : to arrive with detrimental effect
2c: to attempt to undermine or harm something as if by a blow
4: to delete something
5: to lower a flag usually in surrender
7: pierce, penetrate
8a : to engage in battle
8b: to make a military attack
STRIKE: (transitive verb)-
12: to make and ratify the terms of
22: to make one’s way along
ADVOCATE: (transitive verb)
:to plead in favor of
Example of Advocate:

The plan is advocated by the president

{Note: The definitions presented are those that FACTUAL are definitions of those words er the Marriam-Webster Dictionary, but some definitions have been ommited due to irrelevance to the subject at hand. For full complete definitions, please use the links at the bottom of this article}

With these words defined per relevance, lets take a look at Article 5 U.S.C. 7311 with the “words” replaced by the definitions of those words. This way the REAL meaning will be understood Honestly, Truthfully, and Factually without any confusion.

Article 5 U.S.C. 7311 states [1]:

An individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he (or She)-

  1. pleads in favor of the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
  2. is a member of an organization that he/she knows  pleads in favor of the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
  3. participates in a to delete something, or to make and ratify the terms of, or asserts the right to to delete something, or to make and ratify the terms of or against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; or
  4. is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he/she knows asserts the right to to delete something or  to make and ratify the terms of or against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia.

With this irrefutable understanding of what Article 5 U.S.V 7311 REALLY says, we will now take a look at a bill that is set to be pushed through and passed with Barack Obama’s promise of the power fully entitled to the office of the President of The United States.

It must be mentioned that The President of The United States of America is also bound by the Oath of Office.

It also MUST be mentioned that, according to Article 5 U.S.C. 7311, ANY representative who does not comply with those stated declarations and limitations, is in FACT, invalidating ANY and ALL authority to be recognized to perform the functions of the office they were elected to hold as a representative.

On Jan 23, 2013, Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) introduced a bill regarding Assault weapons and High Capacity Magazines[4]. Today I was informed, through an email from Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) of Sen. Feinstein’s new “Assault Weapons” Ban which, if passed, would affect not only those citizens who own “Assault Weapons” but Every Single Gun Owner in the United States of America.

According to the email from Rand Paul, these are his reactions to what that NEW bill entails;

“They’re targeting EVERYTHING — rifles, shotguns and even handguns — and every gun owner and gun purchase is to be cataloged and tracked by the federal government.” – Sen. Rand Paul

This seems to go against the claims that any new guns laws would not affect any law abiding citizen. But there’s More.

Here is what Sen. Rand Paul detailed about some of the NEW changes to Sen. Feinstein’s previous bill:

Included in the NEW Assault Weapons Ban Bill:

  •  Ban the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of 120 specifically named rifles, shotguns and handguns!
  • Ban the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of ALL firearms with a detachable magazine and at least one “military characteristic”

“Which could mean just about anything that makes a gun “Look Scary”” – Sen. Rand Paul commentary

  • Ban the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of magazines holding more than 10 rounds;
  • Force owners of ALL “grandfathered” weapons to undergo an intrusive background check and fingerprinting — treating law-abiding citizens like criminals;
  • Force owners of ALL “grandfathered” weapons to federally register their guns after obtaining a permission slip from local law enforcement showing their guns are not in violation of state or local law.

Sen. Rand Paul had this to say regarding the new bill:

“If you own a magazine that’s are than 10 rounds, you’ll have to register it with the BATFE in their National Firearms Registry.

The Ban on Transfers means you and I can forget about ever handing down one of these guns to our kids and grandkids.

Worse, it could mean widows become INSTANT FELONS if their husbands owned one of these banned magazines or firearms”

Is there any basis for concern? 

SIMPLE FACT: Diane Feinstein has no regard for the Second Amendment, and for those who can’t or won’t believe that, I refer you to a quote from a 60 minutes interview she conducted while passing th 1994 Assault Weapons Ban:

“If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up everyone of them,  Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in. I would have done it.” – Sen. Diane Feinstein

Th Simple Fact is that this quote was referring specifically to the weapons as outlined in her 1994 Assault Weapons ban. But, now it seems she is not just concerned with just an Assault Weapons, but ALL guns owned by ALL law abiding citizens as defined in the above disclosure by Sen. Rand Paul. Incidentally, Nothing in her plan would address the illegal guns or criminals in general.

In order to truly justify if a breech of Article 5 U.S.C. 7311 is occurring due to this proposal, we must look at the source of the issue; The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution (Number two of the ten Bill of Rights). This is truly a larger discussion than the amount of space alloted here, so I will go over it briefly. I will be posting an entire article shortly that tackles in detail,the Second Amendment and what it’s REAL intent was and what would happen if it is restricted. As well as what would happen in regards to all the other Constitutional Rights

The Second Amendment of The United States Constitution:

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

It’s kind of hard to believe that this one sentence has been abused, misinterpreted, and misrepresented more than any other Amendment, often times by our own representatives. But hopefully I can quickly explain the REAL Meaning in a brief amount of space.

  • well RegulatedWell Regulated, at the time of this Amendments writing meant Proficient, Practiced, Skilled. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with restrictions as the word is used today.
  • Militia: This one word has become the most misused, mainly by those advocating strict gun control. Some claim it means The National Guard, or another form of Government armed force. This is completely WRONG as that would invalidate the entire reason for the Second Amendment to even be in existence. Again, we must revisit the time this was written.A perfect example comes from the ACTUAL author of the Bill of Rights, of which this Amendment is second on that list.

“Citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties.” James Madison – The Federalist Papers, No. 46

Does that mean citizens Attacking and overthrowing the government? Certainly not. Not only would that be treasonous, but it would be against what every patriotic American citizen stands for. But, It does mean, in the context of the whole Amendment, as we will see in “being necessary…” that of being proficiently armed to defend against the reduction of liberties by an overpowering government. Self Defense is the entire key to this whole Amendment the one fact that those who advocate restrictions ignore.

  • being necessary to the security of a free state: The Simple Fact that The United States came into being out of the desire to be free from an overpowering government, this one should be self-explanatory. It defines the necessity of The Whole Amendment’s meaning as well, in order for freedom, it is necessary for the people to have means to defend themselves with no less than equal means available to any aggressor.
  • the right of the people: The rights, again pertaining to the context of The Whole Amendment, of Every Equal citizen. We The People, EVERY law abiding citizen who are all Equal under the law. It never states certain citizens have the right but other’s do not.
  • to keep and bear arms: Self-explanatory once gain. Keep: to retain in one’s possession or power. Bare: open to view, unmitigated Arms: in the context of The Whole Amendment, A weapon, A firearm (Gun). Notice how it never states a limit. At the time of it’s being passed, the private citizens had the rights to own the most advanced weapons at that time, equal to the United States Military. The debate that it refers only to muskets is not only ridiculous, but idiotic.
  • shall not be infringed: This is the Binding part of the Amendment. It starts of with Shall: a command  Not: the negative of a preceding group of words. Be Infringed: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another.

SIMPLE FACT:  The Second Amendment COMMANDS all equal citizens to NOT violate another EQUAL citizens right to posses, or the use of no less than an equal weapon possessed or used by anyone violating the individual equal citizens liberties. This is defined by not only this Amendment, but every Right guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.

Why is that so impossible for some to understand? Its basic common sense folks. The words mean EXACTLY what they say. No more and DEFINITELY No less.

Now, what does this mean regarding Sen. Feinstein, as well as other representatives impending proposals on gun bans?

Well, it means that what they are proposing is a COMPLETE violation to Article 5 U.S.C 7133

Remember this part that states,(in our Simple defined version):

An individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he (or She) participates to delete something, or to make and ratify the terms of, or asserts the right to delete something, or to make and ratify the terms of or against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia

And remember these Simple Fact?

The United States of America is a nations of laws.

The United States Constitution is the Supreme Law of The Land, meaning the ENTIRE United States, as well as Every citizen residing within the The United States. We are ALL EQUALLY subject to the laws which are in 100% compliance with That Supreme Law of The Land.

What these two facts, when combined, state is:

The United States Constitution, the supreme law of the land, is in fact the form of government which our nation is Governed by.

That means, any of our representatives who participates in deleting something (The rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment), or to make and ratify the terms of (Changing the Constitutional Rights of equality for any citizens they claim to represent), or asserts the right to delete something (Claim they have the power to make unconstitutional changes), or (By restricting citizens rights, they are fundamentally changing the form of Government they made an oath to defend) to make and ratify the terms of or against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia.

Simply Stated: What is being proposed goes against the Constitution, The Supreme Law of The Land, and more importantly our form of Government as a Constitutional republic of We The People.

These actions are enacting a Government ruled by The representatives and NOT a Government ruled by We The People.

This attack against the Government of the United States is in violation to Article 5 U.S.C 7311.

They are, through their proposals and actions, invalidating their authority to accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia.

So what can We The People Do to make sure they honor their Oath of Office?

  1. Sign This Petition
  2. Write ALL your representatives. If you don’t know what to write; Copy and Paste this entire article onto your computer, print it out and send it to them.
  3. Do the same with this letter
  4. Send letters explaining the Article 5 U.S.C 7311 as described here to ALL your local news outlets, newspapers, local politicians (from the city council all the way up to as high on the political latter you wish to contact) The more the better.
  5. Share this information with EVERYONE you know.

This is not a time to do nothing.

YOUR Nation’s VERY foundation is at stake.

How much longer are WE The People going to allow this to continue?

 YOU are the government

YOU are an EQUAL participant in the governance of OUR Nation

YOU are NOT insignificant. Silence is Insignificant

YOU ARE the VOICE of AMERICA

– Yllek T Mas

http://www.yllektmas.com/

[1] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7311

[2] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/strike

[3] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/advocates

[4] http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=5dffbf07-d8e5-42aa-9f22-0743368dd754

[5] http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fed_46.html

Advertisements
  1. […] if you read my previous article Are We All Equal Under The Law may see that I have restated some of the information I presented from that article, but please read […]

  2. […] if you read my previous article Are We All Equal Under The Law may see that I have restated some of the information I presented from that article, but please read […]

Exercise your Free Speech and leave a Reply...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: